They have a dream: “The coming war with Islam”.

This is the stuff of the pleasant day dreams of our forum fanatics. Nothing brightens their day like wistful thoughts of ‘war with Islam’. Though you do wonder what war against a particular religion would look like. Maybe they’ll just destroy mosques and burn the Koran. Let’s see what insane ideas they have for us.

drop a couple of neutron's and lets get on with our lives...

Sweet, aren’t they?

The real question is what are the best ways for civilized democracies to survive the barbarism that comes out of the backward, brutal, radical Muslim world.
How can the civilized world ( any nation, not just Israel ) deal with radical Muslims, who obviously lack human compassion, and have no souls or normal human feelings. If the radical Muslim world is not stopped, it will destroy the civilized world, and then everyone on this planet will be living similar to the Muslim world, in poverty, in misery, in brutal, backward dictatorships.
I believe that the civilized nations must do everything possible to rid this world of the cancerous threat from the radical Muslim world. If that means sending agents into every other nation of this world to do it, then so be it. It must be done.

Yes, Islam is taking over the world reducing it to barbarism, therefore we must kill, kill, kill, in the name of civilisation. But then, they aren’t actually human like us, so it’s OK.

Of course, the forum fanatics are not without their own brand of sophisticated moral philosophers,

Instead of quibbling about a few lives here and there, why not just FIGHT? "Utter savagery" is required to defeat the enemy, no matter WHOSE side you are on. To pretend differently is to lie to and weaken yourself. To expect to fight a surgically precise war is absurd. So many people act as if legalistic micro-management of each human action in the war between cultures will solve anything. This is a large struggle but the tendency is to overly analyze each trivial event. The West is fond of this, and while navel-gazing may be entertaining it doesn't smash the enemy ranks. That takes shot and shell.
Human processes are sloppy, wars are sloppy, and cultural wars are VERY sloppy. Let's admit that there will probably be hundreds of thousands of casualties once the war gets up to speed. To admit a thing is not to welcome it, but to understand it!
Let's ACCEPT that resolution is beyond debate, and start considering how the side we choose may seek advantage. Culture war erases the fundamental need for the subjective construct of "right". We try to inculcate the concept of "right" to make sheeple behave. This works fine among social groups where people need each others cooperation. It is not a useful invention for a struggle where an enemy must be destroyed. Self-imposed obstacles fall away when we choose, with considered forethought, to stop imposing them. Since we fight an obstacle free opponent (not because he is obstacle-free, but because his desired end-result differs from ours) we should not tie our own hands for academic reasons.
The war with islam is not because of the name we call one of its techniques ("terrorism"), but because we do not prefer the society it produces. Let's not confuse process with result. If we are willing to fight, that implies a willingness to sacrifice ourselves as individuals. If that is an acceptable sacrifice, so is collateral damage. Collateral damage is people. Tough excrement.

Yes, that’s right, the war with Islam has, as it’s goal, the elimination of an entire society. Would trains and work camps do the trick?

Hmmmm, straight-jacket, or chemical restraint……which is best?